What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal?
It was found in South Japan
It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago
The fossils had parts of sponges and cnidarians
It is from the Edicaran Period
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal? It was found in South Japan It is dated from about ...” in 📙 Biology if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Which label should Megan add to complete her chart?
Answers (1)
1. Which pair of nitrogenous bases will form a bond in a DNA molecule?
Answers (1)
Which test is used to determine whether the substance being tested is likely to cause cancer in human?
Answers (1)
Which of the following types of pathogens can only reproduce itself if it atakes over host cells? - fungi -bacteria -virus -protozoa
Answers (2)
Based on your results, which antimicrobial agent (s) best inhibited the growth of E. col? What was the lowest effective concentration of the agent (s) ?
Answers (1)
New Questions in Biology
Which of the following factors does NOT limit population growth? a. species c. space b. carrying capacity d. food
Answers (2)
What happens if a mutation is in a gamete
Answers (1)
Which area of the stomach directly adjoins the small intestine?
Answers (1)
Athletes foot is caused by
Answers (2)
Compare the characteristics of rivers and streams.
Answers (1)