Ask Question
9 October, 12:02

A. if you found a stock with a zero historical beta and held it as the only stock in your portfolio, you would by definition have a riskless portfolio.

b. the beta of a portfolio of stocks is always larger than the betas of any of the individual stocks.

c. the beta of a portfolio of stocks is always smaller than the betas of any of the individual stocks.

d. it is theoretically possible for a stock to have a beta of 1.0. if a stock did have a beta of 1.0, then, at least in theory, its required rate of return would be equal to the risk-free (default-free) rate of return, rrf.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 9 October, 12:09
    0
    Answer is c. the beta of a portfolio of stocks is always smaller than the betas of any of the individual stocks.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “A. if you found a stock with a zero historical beta and held it as the only stock in your portfolio, you would by definition have a ...” in 📙 Business if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers