Sanderson worked in a travel service office and had access to the reservation systems of several airlines. sanderson accessed the system and replaced the names of passengers with fictitious names. she also enrolled the fake names in the airlines' frequent-flyer programs. her husband set up mailboxes under those names for the delivery of free airline tickets "earned" under the frequent-flyer programs. real passengers were not harmed by and did not complain of the deception. the sandersons' behavior was

Question

Business

Pintsize

5 April, 02:35

Sanderson worked in a travel service office and had access to the reservation systems of several airlines. sanderson accessed the system and replaced the names of passengers with fictitious names. she also enrolled the fake names in the airlines' frequent-flyer programs. her husband set up mailboxes under those names for the delivery of free airline tickets "earned" under the frequent-flyer programs. real passengers were not harmed by and did not complain of the deception. the sandersons' behavior was

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Elisha Huang · Answer 1

Although the real passengers were not harmed by Sanderson's actions and decided not to complain due to her deception, Sanderson's behavior was illegal and unethical. Her actions could be considered as theft since she deliberately manipulated the system in her favor to gain the free airline tickets that were supposed to go to the real passengers.