Several years ago, a group of scientists discovered evidence for a new element not found on the periodic table. Most
scientists did not accept the discovery at that time. Since then, other scientists have seen evidence of the new element.
Which statement best describes the results of this delay in scientific knowledge?
It is beneficial because it gives credit to more experienced scientists for the discovery.
It is beneficial because it provides stronger support for the evidence related to the discovery
It is not beneficial because it delays the process of celebrating the new discovery
It is not beneficial because it removes recognition from those who originally made the discovery.
+5
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Several years ago, a group of scientists discovered evidence for a new element not found on the periodic table. Most scientists did not ...” in 📙 Chemistry if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Home » Chemistry » Several years ago, a group of scientists discovered evidence for a new element not found on the periodic table. Most scientists did not accept the discovery at that time. Since then, other scientists have seen evidence of the new element.