Ask Question
11 January, 08:40

Why do you think courts of appeals generally limit their review of cases to questions of the law rather than to matters of fact

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 11 January, 11:28
    0
    Because the facts were dealt with at the trial.

    You were convicted there.

    The appeals process is to see if matters of law were violated in your case.

    That is why you must have "grounds for appeal" for your appeal to move forward.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why do you think courts of appeals generally limit their review of cases to questions of the law rather than to matters of fact ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers