Which best describes the way historians consider letters and journals?

a) primary source documents that are useful in the study of history

b) reliable sources for the study of history only if from a named source

c) secondary source documents that are useful in the study of history

d) unreliable sources for the study of history because they are too subjective

Question

History

Tanner Morris

20 July, 18:58

Which best describes the way historians consider letters and journals?

a) primary source documents that are useful in the study of history

b) reliable sources for the study of history only if from a named source

c) secondary source documents that are useful in the study of history

d) unreliable sources for the study of history because they are too subjective

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Ramiro Waller · Answer 1

It would be as " a) primary source documents that are useful in the study of history" that historians consider letters and journals, since these provide and "unfiltered" view into the lives and minds of people who lived in the past.