Ask Question
HistoryHistory
29 March, 11:51

Compared to other monarchs in Europe, kings and queens in England before 1600 were

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 29 March, 15:03
    0
    They were weak. They don't have much power with that title. Most of the power were in the hands of nobles and the upper class. They make more decisions than the monarch. They don't have their own army
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Compared to other monarchs in Europe, kings and queens in England before 1600 were ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Where did God lead Abraham and his people? a. Ur b. Canaan c. Egypt d. Babylon
Answers (2)
How did world war ii changed the lives of many women and african americans?
Answers (1)
What caused the outbreak of the korean war?
Answers (2)
Which phenomenon did triangular trade most directly encourage? democratization of english colonists. depopulation of native americans. migration of enslaved africans. urbanization of european artisans
Answers (1)
Decribe the four motives of the new imperialists
Answers (2)
New Questions in History
Select all that apply. Three characteristics of civilizations are- cities culture military pollution rodents social classes
Answers (2)
What kind of bomb was dropped on hiroshima?
Answers (1)
According to the federal election commission, what is one action that a national party committee must preform hold a national convention
Answers (1)
What issue began to divide political parties in the 1850s
Answers (1)
These ideas of Catherine the great of Russia originated during the
Answers (2)
Home » History » Compared to other monarchs in Europe, kings and queens in England before 1600 were
Sign Up Forgot Password?