Suppose a utilitarian abolitionist argues that the death penalty is too costly to implement in a democratic society. a plausible nonconsequentialist reply is that

Question

Social Studies

Devon Austin

24 August, 02:02

Suppose a utilitarian abolitionist argues that the death penalty is too costly to implement in a democratic society. a plausible nonconsequentialist reply is that

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Arielle Wheeler · Answer 1

Non-Consequentialist answers contend that intercessions are unjustified for reasons having nothing to do with their outcomes. So we can say that the answer would be based on the problem is that the death penalty is a just punishment, then the costs involved do not matter.