Ask Question
23 February, 15:25

The case of hugo zacchini, the "human cannonball," was an oddity in appropriation law because

a. the plaintiff was not identified in the film.

b. all represented facts were indeed true.

c. the plaintiff was in a public place.

d. the appropriation occurred in a news program.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 23 February, 15:51
    0
    I think the answer is the appropriation occurred in a news program.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “The case of hugo zacchini, the "human cannonball," was an oddity in appropriation law because a. the plaintiff was not identified in the ...” in 📙 Social Studies if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers