Ask Question
24 June, 21:37

An argument against euthanasia asserting that mercy killing would involve treating persons as mere things and of no more value than of a beast draws on

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 24 June, 22:59
    0
    An argument against euthanasia asserting that mercy killing would involve treating persons as mere things and of no more value than of a beast draws on " Kant’s categorical imperative".

    The Categorical Imperative should give an approach to us to assess moral activities and to make moral judgments. It's anything but a charge to perform particular activities - it doesn't state, "take after the 10 instructions", or "regard your senior citizens". It is basically "exhaust" - it is just formal technique by which to assess any activity about which may be ethically important.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “An argument against euthanasia asserting that mercy killing would involve treating persons as mere things and of no more value than of a ...” in 📙 Social Studies if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers