Although American artists are largely protected from direct censorship by the US Constitution's first amendment, government funding is subject to approval by local and national legislators who sometimes balk at funding the world of certain artistsa. trueb. false

Question

Arts

Mariah Baird

15 April, 14:17

Although American artists are largely protected from direct censorship by the US Constitution's first amendment, government funding is subject to approval by local and national legislators who sometimes balk at funding the world of certain artistsa. trueb. false

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Jeffrey Montes · Answer 1

Answer: True

Explanation:

The 1st amendment protects and endows a citizen with free spech and freedom of expression, any act against this right is considered illegal. Funding of an artist's work can be cut however, and this act on itself is not considered illegal. An artist for example may produce erotic artwork that a local legislator may find offensive and as such refuse to provide funding or a platform that would allow the artist to express or show his or her work, which some would consider is a form of censorship.