Why is the hypothesis that breaking a mirror cause seven years of bad luck not science? Why Is that the right answer?
a. The results of studying the hypothesis are repeatable
b. The results of studying the hypothesis are not biased
c. A hypothesis based on opinion cannot be tested by an experiment
d. How you break the mirror affects the results of the experiment.
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why is the hypothesis that breaking a mirror cause seven years of bad luck not science? Why Is that the right answer? a. The results of ...” in 📙 Biology if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Why compost fertilizer is organic fertilizer
Answers (1)
Giraffes have long neck that allows them to eat leaves in trees. what is this an example of
Answers (1)
Are most vitamins and minerals present in amounts at or near 100% of the adult dri?
Answers (1)
What type of wave carries more energy radio waves or visible light?
Answers (1)
The mitral valve, located between the left atrium and left ventricle, is also called the:
Answers (1)
New Questions in Biology
Besides the ability of some cancer cells to divide uncontrollably, what else could logically result in a tumor?
Answers (1)
Which of the following is an abiotic factor you might find in a desert
Answers (1)
A population is a population is a group of individuals of the same species that live in the same area and interbreed. all individuals of a species, regardless of location or time period in which they live.
Answers (1)
Tongues have the ability to taste sweet, sour, salty, and bitter. true false
Answers (2)
How could I measure the rate of photosynthesis in a scientific experiment that'll test the effect of light intensity on the rate of photosynthesis with an Elodea plant?
Answers (1)