Paulo makes the argument that the asteroid strike that likely contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs was a short-tem environmental change because it happened so quickly. Which is the best analysis of Paulo's position? He is correct; it happened in just a few seconds. He is correct; it did not cause any long-term changes. He is incorrect; it caused long-term changes. He is incorrect; impacts are not environmental changes.

Question

Gabrielle

2 January, 17:25

+2

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Markus Durham · Answer 1

He is incorrect because there are long term changes such as dionsoaurs died of mailny from it some scitentist say but for quick I say its c.

Tristan Norman · Answer 2

D: He is incorrect, the impact caused long term changes