Ask Question
3 December, 20:27

Why is dna evidence more conclusive in proving a person's innocence rather than proving his/her guilt?

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 3 December, 23:49
    0
    A comprehensive match requires sequencing the entire genome; disporiving a match just requires finding any discrepancies at all. In other words, as soon as you find something different, you have proven innocent. To prove guilt you have to go all the way through.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why is dna evidence more conclusive in proving a person's innocence rather than proving his/her guilt? ...” in 📙 Biology if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers