How do the inherently suspect and reasonable standards differ? A. The inherently suspect standard evaluates whether a law is rationally connected to a legitimate government goal; the reasonableness standard evaluates whether a law is the least restrictive way to achieve that goal. B. The inherently suspect standard is a higher threshold for determining whether a law is constitutional. C. Under the inherently suspect standard, a law is presumed to be valid; under the reasonableness standard, a law is presumed to be invalid. D. The inherently suspect standard relies on observation; the reasonableness standard relies on data.

Question

Biology

Rudy Nelson

28 August, 00:21

How do the inherently suspect and reasonable standards differ? A. The inherently suspect standard evaluates whether a law is rationally connected to a legitimate government goal; the reasonableness standard evaluates whether a law is the least restrictive way to achieve that goal. B. The inherently suspect standard is a higher threshold for determining whether a law is constitutional. C. Under the inherently suspect standard, a law is presumed to be valid; under the reasonableness standard, a law is presumed to be invalid. D. The inherently suspect standard relies on observation; the reasonableness standard relies on data.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

August · Answer 1

The correct answer is:

B. The inherently suspect standard is a higher threshold for determining whether a law is constitutional

Explanation:

The Supreme Court applied this statement standard for affirmative action policies with the aim of achieving more equality