Ask Question
8 December, 10:25

Natural selection suggests that creatures with mutations disadvantageous to survival will not live to reproduce, yet there are examples, such as albino animals, found occasionally. Do these exceptions discredit natural selection? Explain your answer.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 8 December, 12:35
    0
    Answer: No

    Explanation: It is beneficial if the animals that are disadvantageous doesn't reproduce so it doesn't discredit natural selection. The traits in which variation is occured are more suitable for organism to live and reproduce in the environment are preserved and are passed from generation to generation.

    However, natural selection effects limited number of progeny.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Natural selection suggests that creatures with mutations disadvantageous to survival will not live to reproduce, yet there are examples, ...” in 📙 Biology if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers