A student plans on interviewing 15 principals in neighboring high schools. The student plans to collect data about the personal experiences the principals have had with disruptive students, including the types of disciplinary actions that were taken (including decisions they may have personally made) and their feelings or thoughts regarding whether those actions were appropriate. The research data collected could have an impact on the principals' careers. The student will collect identifiers. This study would be subject to which type of review? a) Expedited Review b) Not Human Subjects c) Convened Review d) Exempt Review

The question is correct but the option is incorrect. The correct option is as follows:

a) Expedited Review b) Not Human Subjects c) Convened Review d) Exempt Review e) Full board review.

Answer:

Full board review.

Explanation:

IRB (Institutional Review Board) is mainly responsible for the protection and maintains the ethics that are involved in the research related to humans and other animals.

The full board review requires more time that n the other type of review. This review is mainly done in the cases where the participants can get misleading information. This review includes the research that are based on to involve the judgement and involves less risk. The information given in the question explain the full board type review.

Thus, the correct answer is full board review.

Option A

Explanation:

In an expedited review, is conducted to review certain incidences or person without causing any harm (such as employ ability, financial, reputation, health etc) to the participant. Here, the information about principal's behaviour is gathered from students (focus group) with an assurance that the survey and its results only will affect the principal and not the participants. The subject's privacy can get invaded in such research studies / review.

Hence, option A is correct