Ask Question
28 April, 18:12

A secondary source might be eliminated by a good researcher because

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 28 April, 20:41
    0
    Because good researchers rely on first hand account or better said primary evidence. The reason why they rely on primary evidence is because it is usually the most reliable. Much more so than secondary or even tertiary evidence. This enables them to understand the history of a certain topic better.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “A secondary source might be eliminated by a good researcher because ...” in 📙 Biology if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers