Conclusions based on flawed data that does not answer a testable question is an example of ... A} an inference B) a scientific explanation C) pseudoscience D) science

C is the correct answer and they put turbo building back so yeah

Explanation: vault the mechs

Option C, pseudoscience

Explanation:

When a fact has no logical or scientific backing to support its existence and is considered true only on the basis of beliefs prevailing in any society since ages. For example - spiritual science, horoscope, palm reading, tarot card, existence of God etc.

Thus, any flawed data that cannot be tested comes under the category of pseudoscience.

Hence, option C is correct