Why is a short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a population than a long-term change?
Animals do not have time to adapt.
Animals always die.
Animals always move away and leave the ecosystem with less biodiversity.
All of the above.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why is a short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a population than a long-term change? Animals do not have time to ...” in 📙 Biology if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
How did Darwin's understanding of heritability weaken his arguments?
Answers (1)
Identify the order of the eight levels of taxonomy, from least specific (largest) to most specific (smallest), using the drop down menus. Family Genus Kingdom Domain Class Species Order Phylum
Answers (1)
This is any cell in a living organism that is not part of reproduction. Example: skin cells, muscle tissue
Answers (1)
1. How does a universal genetic code relate to the hypotheses about the origin of life on Earth?
Answers (1)
What term refers to any type of a living organism that is not indigenous to an ecosystem
Answers (1)
New Questions in Biology
how would i use a punnett square to explain how a dominant allele masks the presence of a recessive allele
Answers (1)
Which change in a sample of pond water could indicate that heterotrophic microbes were active?
Answers (1)
Selena made a chart to group adaptations in birds based on their main functions. Which functions should Selena use as headings to complete the chart?
Answers (1)
You need to prepare a heparin IV bag of 25,000 units in D5W 500mL. Your pharmacy usually uses 2.5mL of 10,000iu/mL to make these bags, but the only available strength of heparin in your pharmacy is 10,000iu/10mL.
Answers (1)
What natural element is one of the best preservers of prehistoric time
Answers (2)