Why is a short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a population than a long-term change?
Animals do not have time to adapt.
Animals always die.
Animals always move away and leave the ecosystem with less biodiversity.
All of the above.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why is a short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a population than a long-term change? Animals do not have time to ...” in 📙 Biology if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
With the use of site-directed mutagenesis, hemoglobin has been prepared in which the proximal histidine residues in both alpha and the beta subunits have been replaced by glycine.
Answers (1)
Which biology term best describes a wooden table
Answers (2)
One year, heavy rain makes Lake Raymond very deep. The next year, however, rain is very light, and not much water is left in Lake Raymond.
Answers (1)
How has the discovery of DNA affected the classification of protists?
Answers (1)
Interactions between the red blood cell and important molecules, cells, and organs
Answers (1)
New Questions in Biology
What are the two reasons for the change in the population of the giraffes?
Answers (1)
Question 2 2 pts Which of the following individuals has the darkest skin color. Dark skin is represented by the dominant allele. AaBBCC AAbbcc AaBBCC АаВЫСс
Answers (1)
A mixture that is so evenly mixed, it is hard to distinguish its parts visibly
Answers (1)
How is anaphase 2 similar to anaphase in mitosis?
Answers (1)
Which is a likely location for primary succession?
Answers (2)