Why is a short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a population than a long-term change?
Animals do not have time to adapt.
Animals always die.
Animals always move away and leave the ecosystem with less biodiversity.
All of the above.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why is a short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a population than a long-term change? Animals do not have time to ...” in 📙 Biology if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What supports more life relative to their area - freshwater ecosystems or marine ecosystems? why?
Answers (1)
Which term describes a change in the environment that causes a response in a living organism?
Answers (1)
What provides for all organisms needs?
Answers (1)
Why is genetic code considered universal
Answers (1)
Gap 1 Phase in a sentence
Answers (1)
New Questions in Biology
Which mineral is important for carrying o2 in the blood?
Answers (1)
Which best describes an acquired trait?
Answers (1)
How are new molecules of dna are synthesized by copying the genetic sequence of another molecule of dna, which we call the template, so that __?
Answers (1)
How do scientists think the oceans are likely to change in the future?
Answers (1)
Which organ or tissue controls body temperature and shivering?
Answers (1)