What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck? A. Lamarck was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Darwin did not do. B. The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Lamarck was able to prove it. C. The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Darwin was able to prove it. D. Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Lamarck did not do.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck? A. Lamarck was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Darwin did not do. B. ...” in 📙 Biology if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
How can a student pay for an education as part of a work-study program? A) By taking a school job as part of a financial aid plan B) By agreeing to work in the government for a scholarship C) By agreeing to serve in the military after getting a
Answers (1)
Electrical charges in storms?
Answers (2)
Which statement about the heart and circulation is false Aerobic fitness training raises the risk of heart disease. b. The hemoglobin on red cells, uses iron to carry oxygen and the healthy diet must include sufficient iron to avoid anemia.
Answers (1)
Which oxygen delivery system most reliably delivers a high (90% or greater) concentration of inspired oxygen to a 7yo child?
Answers (1)
What are 6 factors of weather? Real Subject: Science
Answers (2)
New Questions in Biology
What are giant, multinucleated cells that remove and recycle bone matrix called?
Answers (1)
A garden is an example of a
Answers (1)
During what geological period do the angiosperms become more common
Answers (1)
Many questions about ethical concerns and issues of personal morality cannot be answered by science. True False
Answers (1)
This nutrient is needed for proper growth and development and functions to repair and replace body cells.
Answers (1)