What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck? A. The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Lamarck was able to prove it. B. Lamarck was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Darwin did not do. C. Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Lamarck did not do. D. The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Darwin was able to prove it. I know it is definetly not b and c because they both had that in common

Question

Biology

Lilianna Burton

4 March, 12:03

What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck? A. The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Lamarck was able to prove it. B. Lamarck was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Darwin did not do. C. Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Lamarck did not do. D. The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Darwin was able to prove it. I know it is definetly not b and c because they both had that in common

+2

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Ibrahim Hall · Answer 1

The opposition between Darwin and Lamarck is D) The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Darwin was able to prove it.

Gracie Odonnell · Answer 2

The main difference between Darwin and Lamarck was that " D. The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Darwin was able to prove it" although this is a lot like answer C ...