Ask Question
25 March, 21:59

U. S. exports are less capital-intensive than U. S. imports, despite the relative abundance of capital in the country. This is in opposition to the Heckscher-Ohlin theory and has been labelleda. a zero-sum game. b. Leontief's paradox. c. a positive-sum game. d. Samuelson's critique. e. a first-mover advantage.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 25 March, 22:55
    0
    The correct answer is option b.

    Explanation:

    According to the Heckscher-Ohlin theory, a capital abundant country specializes in capital intensive goods. Thus it produces capital intensive goods and exports them, and imports labor-intensive good.

    But this does not prove right in the case of the US. Being a capital intensive country it imports capital intensive goods and exports labor-intensive goods.

    This was proved by W. Leontief through empirical evidence. Thus, it is called the Leontief paradox.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “U. S. exports are less capital-intensive than U. S. imports, despite the relative abundance of capital in the country. This is in ...” in 📙 Business if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers