A person who says he's against big government but doesn't want to see any reductions or changes in Medicare a. is being inconsistent and thus violating the principles of moral reasoning. b. may appear inconsistent and thus has the burden of showing that he is not. c. is violating both principles of moral reasoning. d. has made an invalid deductive argument.

Question

Business

Gator

4 December, 22:27

A person who says he's against big government but doesn't want to see any reductions or changes in Medicare a. is being inconsistent and thus violating the principles of moral reasoning. b. may appear inconsistent and thus has the burden of showing that he is not. c. is violating both principles of moral reasoning. d. has made an invalid deductive argument.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Sydney Daugherty · Answer 1

c. is violating both principles of moral reasoning

Explanation:

The argument is deductive invalid as beased on their first sentence that hte government is too big it should accept proportional cuts in all areas of the government including, medicare.

Also, as it being inconsistent as one sentence is in conflit with the other. spending in welfare will make the gervernment weight in the economy to increase or stay the same but, this person claims it needs to decrease.