Harvestons asserted that narnia's service was invalid, in part, because "the return of service states that process was delivered to 'joann kocerek'" and did not show that she "had the authority to accept process on behalf of harvestons or the texas securities commissioner." should such a detail, if it is required, be strictly construed and applied? should it apply in this case? explain.
+4
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Harvestons asserted that narnia's service was invalid, in part, because "the return of service states that process was delivered to 'joann ...” in 📙 Business if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Home » Business » Harvestons asserted that narnia's service was invalid, in part, because "the return of service states that process was delivered to 'joann kocerek'" and did not show that she "had the authority to accept process on behalf of harvestons or the texas