Government inputs, especially the 1825 Erie Canal and subsequent projects like the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal, created an economic advantage for the Northern states because the expense and time of moving freight dropped radically. a False, because any taxation whatsoever destroys economic growth. b False, because the South would never have raised the revenue for any taxpayer-funded improvements, so it's a false comparison. c True, but irrelevant, as agricultural commodities mainly rotted in the field until refrigeration was invented in the 1890s. d True.

Question

Business

Jay Rivera

10 January, 03:44

Government inputs, especially the 1825 Erie Canal and subsequent projects like the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal, created an economic advantage for the Northern states because the expense and time of moving freight dropped radically. a False, because any taxation whatsoever destroys economic growth. b False, because the South would never have raised the revenue for any taxpayer-funded improvements, so it's a false comparison. c True, but irrelevant, as agricultural commodities mainly rotted in the field until refrigeration was invented in the 1890s. d True.

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Cindy Espinoza · Answer 1

The statement that "Government inputs, especially the 1825 Erie Canal and subsequent projects like the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal, created an economic advantage for the Northern states because the expense and time of moving freight dropped radically," is True.

Explanation:

This is on the grounds that tax collection doesn't devastate the economy. Actually, they give income to the administration through which the legislature can back its improvement and government assistance ventures. In addition, burdens additionally fill in as an arrangement of salary re-conveyance for accomplishing higher fairness in an economy. What's more, in antiquated occasions refrigeration was finished utilizing ice-houses and so on.