Ask Question
24 January, 05:59

Which is not a reason for the government to provide a good or service as a public good? the good or service would seem to benefit almost everyone. it would be impractical to make consumers pay individually. it would be inefficient to exclude nonpayers. having more consumers would increase a private provider's cost?

+5
Answers (2)
  1. 24 January, 06:59
    0
    Which is not a reason for the government to provide a good or service as a public good? Having more consumers would increase a private provider's cost. A public good is a good that anyone in the economy can receive and benefit from. This good or service is provided to all members of society without the intent to make a profit. The provider still has to pay to offer the service or make the good, so, if there is more people who are able to receive the product, the cost to make it goes up as well with no profit in return.
  2. 24 January, 07:53
    0
    the answer is D, having more consumers would increase a private providers cost.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Which is not a reason for the government to provide a good or service as a public good? the good or service would seem to benefit almost ...” in 📙 Business if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers