The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ruling held that corporation and union spending on elections can be unlimited but not coordinated with election campaigns. must be no more than $5,000 per federal candidate per election. must be preapproved by the Federal Election Commission. must be coordinated with election campaigns. must go directly to election campaigns if exceeding $5,000 per candidate.

Question

Business

Kirsten Richards

16 February, 20:25

The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ruling held that corporation and union spending on elections can be unlimited but not coordinated with election campaigns. must be no more than $5,000 per federal candidate per election. must be preapproved by the Federal Election Commission. must be coordinated with election campaigns. must go directly to election campaigns if exceeding $5,000 per candidate.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Aryana Guerra · Answer 1

Answer: corporation and union spending on elections can be unlimited but not coordinated with election campaigns.

Explanation: In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled that spending towards an election campaign is the same as free speech and for this reason, it is allowed by the First Amendment. This means that corporations and unions can spend an unlimited amount on election campaigns. However, they should not be directly involved with the campaigns. The ruling gave rise to Super PACs that can raise money for a party or a candidate but must not coordinate with the party/candidate.