What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck?
A. Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Lamarck did not do.
B. The idea of mutation was understood by both but, Darwin could not prove it.
C. Lamarck was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Darwin did not do.
D. The idea of mutation was understood by both but, Lamarck could not prove it
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck? A. Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Lamarck did not do. B. ...” in 📙 Chemistry if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
State the aufbau principle.
Answers (1)
Which greenhouse gas typically exists in both the stratosphere and the troposphere?
Answers (2)
What can the student predict if she finds the mass of the whole candy bar, including the wrapper?
Answers (1)
What does the period number tell about the energy levels occupied by electrons in an atom?
Answers (2)
How many moles are in 9.87 grams of H20?
Answers (1)
New Questions in Chemistry
How many moles are in 4,55 X 10^23 molecules of CO2 (rounded)
Answers (1)
In standardization of NaOH solution, a student found that 25.55cm3 of base neutralized exactly 21.35cm3 of 0.12M HCl. Find the molarity of the NaOH.
Answers (1)
Which is a base unit in SI? A. centimeter B. kilogram C. gram D. grams/milliliter
Answers (1)
The primary mechanism for converting atmospheric carbon into usable forms for life on earth is achieved by
Answers (1)
For a particular collision, she detects the emitted products and find 15 protons, 2 antiprotons, 7 positrons, and 24 neutral particles. How many electrons are also emitted
Answers (1)