True or false?

An effective method for protecting programs against classic stack overflow attacks is to instrument the function entry and exit code to setup and then check its sack frame for any evidence of corruption.

Question

Computers & Technology

Hugh Costa

11 November, 22:52

True or false?

An effective method for protecting programs against classic stack overflow attacks is to instrument the function entry and exit code to setup and then check its sack frame for any evidence of corruption.

+4

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Khloe Rollins · Answer 1

An effective method for protecting programs against c is to instrument the function entry and exit code to setup and then check its sack frame for any evidence of corruption - True.

Explanation:

One of the most widespread and dangerous types of security attacks is the classic stack overflow attack.

However, an effective method for shielding programs against classic stack overflow attacks is to instrument the function entry and exit code to set up and then check its stack frame for any evidence of corruption.

Deegan Barry · Answer 2

True

Explanation:

An effective way of protecting programs against classic stack overflow attacks is to instrument the function entry and exit code to setup and then check its sack frame for any evidence of corruption.

True or false?An effective method for protecting programs against classic stack overflow attacks is to instrument the function entry and exit code to setup and then check its sack frame for any evidence of corruption.

True or false?

An effective method for protecting programs against classic stack overflow attacks is to instrument the function entry and exit code to setup and then check its sack frame for any evidence of corruption.