Ask Question
Today, 00:35

Why is Wikipedia not considered a reliable source?

A) because there is not a printed version of it

B) because it can be easily changed by authors without expertise in the field

C) because too many people use it

D) because teachers say so

+5
Answers (2)
  1. Today, 03:03
    0
    I would consider (B) to be the answer to this question. Wikipedia isn't a reliable source. It can be changed by anyone at anytime.
  2. Today, 04:11
    0
    Will there more reason why but I'm going to go with B) because it tends to be changed constantly.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why is Wikipedia not considered a reliable source? A) because there is not a printed version of it B) because it can be easily changed by ...” in 📙 English if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers