I need to stop at several places, including: the bank, the grocery store, and the dry cleaners.

Which best explains why the colon after "including" should be removed?

A. The colon does not introduce a list of items and is therefore unnecessary.

B. The introductory text in the sentence cannot stand alone.

C. Colons are only used to introduce lists composed of more than three items.

D. Colons are not used to introduce lists of items in sentences.

Question

English

Jamari Landry

4 July, 20:05

I need to stop at several places, including: the bank, the grocery store, and the dry cleaners.

Which best explains why the colon after "including" should be removed?

A. The colon does not introduce a list of items and is therefore unnecessary.

B. The introductory text in the sentence cannot stand alone.

C. Colons are only used to introduce lists composed of more than three items.

D. Colons are not used to introduce lists of items in sentences.

+4

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Roger · Answer 1

The answer is B. The introductory text in the sentence cannot stand alone.

Thus, the introductory text in the sentence cannot stand alone explains best why the colon after "including" should be removed.

Delaney Harmon · Answer 2

The answer is B.

You only use colons after statements that are complete sentences. You never use them after sentence fragments.