Why shouldn't students rely only on spell-checkers while proofreading?
Spell-checkers only catch errors that involve.
a. misspelled word
b. proper noun
c. homophomes
d. word capitalization
They can only tell if words are spelled correctly, not if they are used correctly. There is, in fact, no better strategy than proofreading by doing a close reading.
In particular,
a. using context clues
b. reading aloud
c. citing evidence
d. using "track changes"
is effective because it makes it easier to detect comma splices and run-on sentences.
+5
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why shouldn't students rely only on spell-checkers while proofreading? Spell-checkers only catch errors that involve. a. misspelled word b. ...” in 📙 English if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Home » English » Why shouldn't students rely only on spell-checkers while proofreading? Spell-checkers only catch errors that involve. a. misspelled word b. proper noun c. homophomes d.