Ask Question
29 March, 15:22

This argument appeals to the wheelchair ethos of the wealthy upper middle class American slob if rainbow bridge is worth seeing at all then by God it should be easily readily immediately available to everybody with the money to buy a big powerboat why should a trip to such a place be the privilege only of those who are willing to walk 6 miles? or pikes peak is worth getting too thin why not build a highway to the top of it so that anyone can get there?

A. Circular reasoning fallacy

B. Strawman fallacy

C. Slippery slope fallacy

D. Ad hominem fallacy

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 29 March, 18:12
    0
    Ad hominem; it should be because ad hominem fallacies are known for attacking a person's character.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “This argument appeals to the wheelchair ethos of the wealthy upper middle class American slob if rainbow bridge is worth seeing at all then ...” in 📙 English if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers