The Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines dealt with two students who

were suspended from school for wearing black armbands to protest the

Vietnam War. Their parents sued the school district for violating the students'

right to free speech, but it was determined by lower courts that the school

district had the right to suspend them. When the Supreme Court reviewed the

case, it decided that the school district did not have the right to suspend the

students.

Which of these arguments is least effective in supporting the dissent of the

Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear the armbands

to school?

Question

English

Dayton Mcbride

5 June, 12:07

The Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines dealt with two students who

were suspended from school for wearing black armbands to protest the

Vietnam War. Their parents sued the school district for violating the students'

right to free speech, but it was determined by lower courts that the school

district had the right to suspend them. When the Supreme Court reviewed the

case, it decided that the school district did not have the right to suspend the

students.

Which of these arguments is least effective in supporting the dissent of the

Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear the armbands

to school?

+3

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Jasiah Benjamin · Answer 1

other court cases upheld the right to limit freedom of expression.

Explanation:

<3

Alma Keith · Answer 2

well they like kinda didnt like the war so they wear armband but school get mad so they go bye bye. then they get angry over forced bye bye and went to judge and he was like "yes i shall stop the forced bye bye" because he be getting some sex on the down low for it