English

Kennedy Spears

18 August, 02:48

In an autobiography, how can you get a better understanding of an author's perspective? by studying how the author uses figurative language by observing how the author's style fits his or her purpose by learning about when and how the author lived by studying the author's tone

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Get an answer to your question ✅ “In an autobiography, how can you get a better understanding of an author's perspective? by studying how the author uses figurative language ...” in 📙 English if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Write an alliterative sentence using words that begin with w

4. What is ironic about the fact that the new world still has a police force, which appears on the scene quickly? Brave new world chapter 15

In the opening paragraph of "Speech After Being Convicted Of Voting," what does Susan B. Anthony do A. provides facts and evidence B. Gives an analogy C. States the purpose of the speech D. Asks a rhetorical question

What is the third tense of start?

Which of these statements is true about the play Everyman? The fate of Everyman is predestined. Discretion proves to be Everyman's best friend. God sends angels to seek out Everyman. Everyman represents all that is good in humanity.

New Questions in English

Select the correct answer. When reading a poem closely to interpret its meaning and nuances, what can give you clues about the theme of the poem?

This refers to the ordering of elements in a sentence.

Select the more effective use of correlative conjunctions to join these sentences. You may or may not go with us It depends on your parents. a Whether or not you go with us depends on your parents.

Which corrects any error in the use of apostrophes in the sentence? The numbers on the radios' knobs have worn away. A. There is no error in this sentence. B. radio's C. knobs' D. number's

Jackson compares the removal of Native Americans to the expansion of white settlement in America (and possibly to European immigration to the New World). What logical fallacy-or false reasoning-lies in this comparison?