How would "In a Station of the Metro" change if the bough was bright and lively rather than wet and black?

A.) The station would seem cheerier.

B.) The poem would not be considered imagist.

C.) The people would seem less pleasant.

D.) The poem would no longer be a hokku.

Question

English

Zane

23 June, 08:24

How would "In a Station of the Metro" change if the bough was bright and lively rather than wet and black?

A.) The station would seem cheerier.

B.) The poem would not be considered imagist.

C.) The people would seem less pleasant.

D.) The poem would no longer be a hokku.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Blimpie · Answer 1

"In A Station of the Metro" is a notable work of Imagist period, written by Ezra Pound. Imagism describes precise and concise representation of the material applying economy of the language. Ezra himself cut the lines of his work from thirty to two lines and if we change it in any other way the mood will also change, its structure will change and it will be sounded differently than it was. In summary, it could be said that it would not be considered imagist anymore.

How would "In a Station of the Metro" change if the bough was bright and lively rather than wet and black?A.) The station would seem cheerier.B.) The poem would not be considered imagist.C.) The people would seem less pleasant.D.) The poem would no longer be a hokku.

How would "In a Station of the Metro" change if the bough was bright and lively rather than wet and black?

A.) The station would seem cheerier.

B.) The poem would not be considered imagist.

C.) The people would seem less pleasant.

D.) The poem would no longer be a hokku.