Ask Question
6 October, 16:59

Which is not necessary in a historical essay?

A) Argumentative Thesis Statement

B) First-hand accounts

C) Historical evidence

D) Interpretive claims

E) Properly cited resources

+1
Answers (2)
  1. 6 October, 17:54
    0
    In my view the extra option is D) Interpretive claims. Because it shows author opinion istead of facts. Every scholar should present only facts in the essay
  2. 6 October, 19:17
    0
    Well, you wouldn't need either A) argumentative thesis statement, given that you aren't arguing for anything if you are just writing about a historical figure, or D) interpretive claims, again, because you aren't interpreting anything.

    I would go with D, but either seems correct.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Which is not necessary in a historical essay? A) Argumentative Thesis Statement B) First-hand accounts C) Historical evidence D) ...” in 📙 English if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers