Imoku01 ik u stalking me but this is also a real question
Why is a short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a population than a long-term change?
Question 1 options:
Animals do not have time to adapt.
Animals always die.
Animals always move away and leave the ecosystem with less biodiversity.
All of the above.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Imoku01 ik u stalking me but this is also a real question Why is a short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a ...” in 📙 Geography if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Why was the Soviet Union confident about its power and status up until the early 1970s
Answers (1)
Antarctica is completely covered with ice and lacks native people. a. True b. False
Answers (1)
What is the range of thickness of the crust?
Answers (1)
All STDs will go away if left untreated. A. True B. False
Answers (2)
What is the definition of totalitarian government?
Answers (2)
New Questions in Geography
Where is mt. kilimanjaro?
Answers (1)
The primary purpose of Bretton woods conference was to
Answers (2)
What was the World Trade Organization decision in 2006 related to genetically modified crops? Individual countries had the right to determine if they were going to allow genetically modified crops to come into their country.
Answers (2)
12 out of 50 seventh graders said they would be willing to pay between $21-$30 dollars for a class trip. If there are 350 students in seventh grade, about how many would go oh the trip if it cost $30?
Answers (2)
If a population is growing quickly in a small area then what must increase as well
Answers (2)