Ask Question
HistoryHistory
19 December, 01:12

Why were Motte and Bailey castles replaced by stone castles?

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 19 December, 02:53
    0
    Because they were stronger and more efficient
  2. 19 December, 04:04
    0
    Stone keeps replaced Motte and Bailey castles because the keeps had many defensive mechanisms unlike the Motte and Bailey that were open to being set on fire. In addition, Stone castles were more durable unlike the Motte and Bailey that were made of wood.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why were Motte and Bailey castles replaced by stone castles? ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What technologies did humans develop which allowed them to adapt to new environments
Answers (1)
What led to the king Philips war
Answers (1)
Compare our understanding of the Underworld (Hell) with that of the civilizations we have studied: Mesopotamia. Egypt, Greece, Rome
Answers (1)
What type of new technologies merged in the 1920s? How did these changes affect the daily lives of Americans?
Answers (1)
Who was the first American killed in Vietnam?
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Which of the statements below best explains why a budget is useful
Answers (1)
What devices do microprocessors contain?
Answers (1)
What was the decision of the court in the madison vs marbury
Answers (1)
Hindu determine a statuss by
Answers (1)
Which building material developed in the 1800s allowed Gustav Eiffel to erect the world's tallest structure in Paris in 1889? a. copper b. steel c. aluminum d. concrete
Answers (2)
Home » History » Why were Motte and Bailey castles replaced by stone castles?
Sign Up Forgot Password?