Ask Question
19 December, 01:12

Why were Motte and Bailey castles replaced by stone castles?

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 19 December, 02:53
    0
    Because they were stronger and more efficient
  2. 19 December, 04:04
    0
    Stone keeps replaced Motte and Bailey castles because the keeps had many defensive mechanisms unlike the Motte and Bailey that were open to being set on fire. In addition, Stone castles were more durable unlike the Motte and Bailey that were made of wood.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why were Motte and Bailey castles replaced by stone castles? ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers