Ask Question
24 October, 20:20

In overturning its betts ruling what did the court in effect say about its judgment in that case?

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 24 October, 23:04
    0
    It was unconstitutional--they overturned the Betts decision because they stated it violated the 14th Amendment requiring due process.

    The Betts decision stated a federal crime did not require a person have an attorney. However, the case of Gideon v. Wainwright overturned the original decision. They stated in all court cases a person has the right to an attorney.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “In overturning its betts ruling what did the court in effect say about its judgment in that case? ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers