Ask Question
28 April, 03:58

Why must historians always be skeptical when they read primary sources documents?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 28 April, 04:37
    0
    Because they could be biased and strongly opinionated and also the primary source does not have the benefit of hindsight and is therefore not a valid interpretation and less credible
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why must historians always be skeptical when they read primary sources documents? ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers