In 1966, the supreme court ruled in miranda v. arizona that: question 2 options: suspects could not refuse to cooperate with police. local elections could be monitored by federal officials.

Question

History

Leonardo Copeland

7 October, 09:32

In 1966, the supreme court ruled in miranda v. arizona that: question 2 options: suspects could not refuse to cooperate with police. local elections could be monitored by federal officials.

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Chaim · Answer 1

The supreme court ruled that the suspects can refuse to cooperate and the police has the duty of informing suspects what their rights are and how their rights are applied. Suspects can remain silent and not incriminate themselves which means not cooperating with the police.