Do you think it was right for the Allies to try only Nazi and Japanese leaders for war crimes? Why or why not?

This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that it was right, since a large majority of the atrocities committed took place under Germany and Japan's watch.

In my opinion, it absolutely was not written, as a result of several others countries did treacherous acts, although they didn't appreciate those done by the Nazi and Japanese. British and American leaders operated beneath the rule of law. If they'd sent millions to the instrument of execution or had deliberately slaughtered one hundred, 000 of civilians World Health Organization had already given, they might be tried.

Now the Russian had committed quite a few atrocities. They raped almost each German girls they might get their hands on. The slaughtered Polish prisoners of war a bit like the Germans slaughtered the jews.