This order violated their constitutional and human rights, however the Supreme Court, upheld its implementation in Korematsu v. United States, arguing that, "When under conditions of modern warfare our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to
protect must be commensurate with (in proportion to the threatened danger."
Do you agree with the decision, or do you think the order is a violation of both
constitutional and human rights?
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “This order violated their constitutional and human rights, however the Supreme Court, upheld its implementation in Korematsu v. United ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What do jim and huck do to modify the raft
Answers (1)
What was a major reason for the increased migration of african americans out of the rural south during and following world war 2
Answers (1)
Where is wine production discouraged?
Answers (1)
Why diddn't the northern states want missouri admitted to the union as a slave state?
Answers (2)
Diasporic communities
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
How did the ideas of Einstein and curie contribute to a sense of uncertainty
Answers (1)
How did Robert E. Lee's surrender at Appomattox affected the South's Civil War effort.
Answers (2)
In excerpt one, what is the goal of Carlisle's Indian school
Answers (1)
Afghan soldiers who fought against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 were called
Answers (2)
Which of the these BEST describes why the Zhou dynasty collapsed? A) feudal power structure that gave too much power to regional lords B) failure to keep up technologically with border cultures C) too much exposure to outside cultures through trade
Answers (1)