Ask Question
11 January, 04:56

Which of the following was a ruling in the supreme court, Bush v. Gore?

A. Al Gore would be given the electoral votes in Florida.

B. The state of Florida would not be apart of the election.

C. Flordia had two weeks to finish the recount of ballots.

D. The hand recounts in Florida violated the constitution.

+5
Answers (2)
  1. 11 January, 05:34
    0
    The Answer:

    Choice D, as in November of 2000, the supreme court ruled against Florida considering a local-level recount, calling it "unconstitutional." This was a result of poor ballot designs, called the "punch-in ballots" of the Florida ballots of the 2000 Presidential Election. This lead to many ballots being punched-in incorrectly.
  2. 11 January, 07:01
    0
    Bush v. Gore, 531 U. S. 98 (2000), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that settled a recount dispute in Florida's 2000 presidential election. The ruling was issued on December 13, 2000. On December 9, the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Which of the following was a ruling in the supreme court, Bush v. Gore? A. Al Gore would be given the electoral votes in Florida. B. The ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers