In the case of McCulloch v. Maryland, why did some states oppose the idea of a national bank?
The national bank could have a negative effect on the success of state banks.
The government would close state banks, and many people would lose their jobs.
The state banks would be required to pay taxes to the government to support the national bank.
The state banks would become branches of the national bank and could be required to adopt new rules.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “In the case of McCulloch v. Maryland, why did some states oppose the idea of a national bank? The national bank could have a negative ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
How is the elastic clause related to congress implied powers?
Answers (2)
What did europeans begin to view africa as a source
Answers (1)
What was the American Protective Association
Answers (1)
How did reconstruction change the meaning of freedom
Answers (2)
Which statement characterizes education in European society before the Renaissance? People wrote in their native languages instead of Latin, Most writing was done in Latin because everyone could read it, Students began studying the literature of
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Which of these best describes how early coverage of the Vietnam War reflected networks' desire to attract viewers? Newscasts focused on the personal and the visual. Newscasts focused on facts and figures.
Answers (1)
What is the name of the sumerian wedge-shaped form of writing
Answers (1)
Discuss the impact of minimg ranching and farming in the post civil war
Answers (1)
What did the bonus army demand from president herbert hoover?
Answers (1)
The supreme court has jury trials true or false?
Answers (1)