Sign In
Ask Question
History
Jared
31 January, 02:14
In what sense were the republics in name only
+3
Answers (
1
)
Triston Mcfarland
31 January, 03:39
0
They were republics in name only because you could only vote if you were wealthy and had land if you were poor you meant nothing in society
Comment
Complaint
Link
Know the Answer?
Answer
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅
“In what sense were the republics in name only ...”
in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Before the Camp David Accords, Egypt was considered a friend of Israel and a major Arab nation. an enemy of Israel and an unimportant Arab nation. a friend of Israel and an unimportant Arab nation. an enemy of Israel and a major Arab nation.
Answers (1)
What are two things the Wagner Act accomplished during the Great Depression?
Answers (1)
The First Amendment's right to assemble refers to the ability for citizens to create buildings. True or False
Answers (1)
What were socrates most basic philosophical principles
Answers (1)
How did Abraham Lincoln's election to presidency affected Texas
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
What empire ended the byzantine empire and came close to conquering the Europe?
Answers (1)
Compare and contrast medieval European cities with cities of the contemporary Islamic empire.
Answers (1)
Imagine you are an American when the first votes are being cast for the U. S. House of Representatives. You find a pamphlet on your doorstep that accuses James Madison of opposing individual rights.
Answers (1)
Who created Carnegie steel
Answers (2)
Who were the significant players involved with operation overlord?
Answers (1)
Home
»
History
» In what sense were the republics in name only
Sign In
Sign Up
Forgot Password?