The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford was based on their interpretation that Dred Scott had no "standing" to bring a case to court because
a
he was not a citizen.
b
he was a slave.
c
he lived in a different state.
d
he had lived in areas where slavery was illegal.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford was based on their interpretation that Dred Scott had no "standing" to bring a case to ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Using mental math, the approximate tip to leave for a bill of 81.79, if you tip 15% would be?
Answers (2)
The Romans used mythology to describe how Rome was built. One famous story tells about twin brothers who were put in baskets as babies and sent to float down the Tiber River. A wolf found them and fed them until they were rescued by a shepherd.
Answers (2)
What does disenfranchise mean
Answers (2)
Who lost and gained power during the French Revolution?
Answers (2)
How did Nigeria benefit from oil? how did oil cause harm in Nigeria
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Reason why the golden stool was important to the Asante empire
Answers (1)
Why did the Mandan tribe and Comanche tribe live in such different kinds of villages?
Answers (1)
Whom did Washington blame for defeat
Answers (1)
What were the key Enlightenment ideas that influenced the development of our governmental institutions?
Answers (1)
According to Alice Fletcher, how did the Nez Perce respond to the Dawes Act? Check all of the boxes that apply. The Nez Perce wanted to continue their former lifestyle of moving freely throughout their reservation.
Answers (2)