Ask Question
21 May, 14:04

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source

when analyzing a historical event?

O

A. To hear about the event from someone who was directly involved

O

B. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event

O

C. To see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it

O

D. To understand how people felt during the period when the event

happened

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 21 May, 16:38
    0
    B. To learn about conclusions of many other experts on the event

    Explanation:

    A, C, and D are all examples of first-hand experiences or accounts therefore meaning A, C and D are all primary sources rather than B which is the only secondary source.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Get an answer to your question ✅ “Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event? O A. To hear about the event ...” in 📙 History if there is no answer or all answers are wrong, use a search bar and try to find the answer among similar questions.
Search for Other Answers